Difference between revisions of "Object Relations in Haya"

Latest revision as of 22:54, 7 June 2012

General Information

This article belongs to the TC Category Interlinear Glossed Text from Linguistic Research.

In this category we collect TCwiki pages that feature Interlinear Glossed Text (IGT) from linguistic publications.

IGT are normally demarcated through indenting, numbering and a space above and under the example. One line of text is followed by one line of glosses and a line with free translation completes the pattern. IGTs from linguistic publications are of particular interest, since they represent a unique alignment of language data and linguistic theory. Example sentences from seminal articles are not rarely quoted in linguistic publications for decades which is another good reason why they need our attention.

In an effort to make IGT more accessible to linguistic research, we try to extract original IGT from linguistic publications and in same cases we provide additional linguistic glosses through a subsequent layer of annotation using the TypeCraft Glosser. In this way we hope to contribute to the re-usability of this data.

On each of the our pages that feature IGT from secondary sources, we also provide a short annotated bibliography, sometimes combined with a list of key-terms which can help to gain a perspective on the research questions raised in the original article. The 'Infobox' may contain further information about the linguistic framework used in the original article, as well as additional classifications of the phenomena treated, whenever that is possible.

Keywords

• prepositions
• word order
• passivisation
• cliticalization
• applicatives

Summary

In this article,the authors try to establish the grammatical relations of subject,(indirect)object and oblique in example (1),(2) and (3). (1) illustrates that an oblique object in Haya is preceded by a preposition though not always. However,there are instances in which a verb takes two nominal complements without including a preposition. see example (2)and (3).

(4)and(5) explains the same process of excluding prepositions between the indirect object and the oblique but the difference is that have the applicative marker which marks the eminence of the recipient or beneficiary.

(6)shows thatthe possesor is not afffected by the action of the verb.And in (7) two sucessive nouns illustrate that the possesor is affected by the action of the verb. .The nouns in (2) can be placed in either order (8) .Either banana or child can be passivised see (9) (10) and (11) .The two nouns can appear as pronouns in the OM clitic position.

.in (12) (13) and (14) cliticalization is also possible for sentences with applicatives . In (15) arm can not appear after the verb with child and in 16 child can subectivise but arm can not. .Child can cliticise but arm can not. (see;17) .the passive agent in (18) can not cliticalize in (19) .woman and arm can not cliticalize in 22 that is the passive agent and the possesed body part

  kato he-p3-beat child with stick

  he-P3-give child bananas.

  he-P3-smear child oil.

 He-p3-send-app child bananas.

 he-p3-cook-app child bananas.

   he-p3-break arm of child.

 He-P3-break  child   arm.

 he-p3-give bananas child.

  child he-p3-give-pass bananas

  bananas they-p3-give-pass child

   he-p3-him-give bananas.

 he-P3-them-give child.

   he-P3-them-him-give

  he-P3cook-app bananas child.

   child  he-P3-cook-app-pass bananas.

  bananas they-P3-cook-app-pass child.

   he-P3-him-app bananas.

  he-P3-them cook-app-child.

   I-P3-break arm child.

   child  he-P3-break pass arm.

   arm      it-P3-break-pass child.

     I-P3-him break arm.

   I-p3-it-break child.

   bananas they-P3-cook-pass woman.

  bananas  they-P3-her-cook-pass.

   child he-P3-cook-app-pass woman bananas.

  child   he-P3-break-pass woman arm.

     child  he-P3-her-break-pass arm.

    child  he-P3-it-break-pass woman.