Typecraft v2.5
Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Documenting Lule Sami"

Line 1: Line 1:
 
''There is no clear categorial distinction between adjectives and nouns in Lule Saami. (Reference???) ''  
 
''There is no clear categorial distinction between adjectives and nouns in Lule Saami. (Reference???) ''  
  
This statement is somewhat dubious: if there would be no distinction between adjectives and nouns, how come we have derivational morphology on an adjective when it appears as a noun? (See example) *Strange* (-dorothee)
+
(Dorothee):This statement is somewhat dubious: if there would be no distinction between adjectives and nouns, how come we have derivational morphology on an adjective when it appears as a noun? (See example) *Strange* (-dorothee)
 +
 
 +
(Dorothee): Sammallahti, already in his Table of Contents, talks about derivational nouns and derivational adjectives; so I think we should not talk about there being no categorial distinction between nouns and adjectives!!!
 +
 
 +
 
 +
(Dorothee): Here something different
 +
Concerning '''subcategorization of nominalizers'''' you gave a list which looks interesting:
  
Concerning subcategorization of nominalizers you gave a list which looks interesting:
 
 
 
 
 
- Betegner selve handlingen: '''tjállem''' - the act of writing
 
- Betegner selve handlingen: '''tjállem''' - the act of writing
 
   
 
   
Line 16: Line 19:
 
- Vær- og føreforhold, eller stedet hvor handlingen skjer: '''jådådahka''' - godt føre ; '''tjuoladahka''' - sted hvor en har hugget ved - som heter '''?''' og forkortes '''?'''  (Kristin)
 
- Vær- og føreforhold, eller stedet hvor handlingen skjer: '''jådådahka''' - godt føre ; '''tjuoladahka''' - sted hvor en har hugget ved - som heter '''?''' og forkortes '''?'''  (Kristin)
  
Yet, in its present form I cannot quite make sense out of it. It would help if you could indicate the words citation form and the  
+
Yet, in its present form I cannot quite make sense out of the above listing. It would help if you could indicate the words citation form and the affix, and provide some more context for the Norwegian translations. Thanks
affix, and provide some more context for the Norwegian translations. Thanks - dorothee
+
 
 +
Dorothee
  
 
=======================
 
=======================
  
 
Please add the full reference for Spiik
 
Please add the full reference for Spiik

Revision as of 18:17, 5 November 2008

There is no clear categorial distinction between adjectives and nouns in Lule Saami. (Reference???)

(Dorothee):This statement is somewhat dubious: if there would be no distinction between adjectives and nouns, how come we have derivational morphology on an adjective when it appears as a noun? (See example) *Strange* (-dorothee)

(Dorothee): Sammallahti, already in his Table of Contents, talks about derivational nouns and derivational adjectives; so I think we should not talk about there being no categorial distinction between nouns and adjectives!!!


(Dorothee): Here something different Concerning subcategorization of nominalizers' you gave a list which looks interesting:

- Betegner selve handlingen: tjállem - the act of writing

- Betegner redskap, midlet til å utføre handlingen med: gåjvun - ??

- Gjenstand for handlingen: gåbtjås ??

- Resultatet (produktet) av handlingen: tjála - text ???

- Vær- og føreforhold, eller stedet hvor handlingen skjer: jådådahka - godt føre ; tjuoladahka - sted hvor en har hugget ved - som heter ? og forkortes ? (Kristin)

Yet, in its present form I cannot quite make sense out of the above listing. It would help if you could indicate the words citation form and the affix, and provide some more context for the Norwegian translations. Thanks

Dorothee

===========

Please add the full reference for Spiik