Difference between revisions of "Talk:Annotating Konkomba"
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
--[[User:Dorothee Beermann|Dorothee]] 18:06, 16 December 2009 (UTC)  | --[[User:Dorothee Beermann|Dorothee]] 18:06, 16 December 2009 (UTC)  | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ====Negative Marking in Runyankore-Rukiga====  | ||
| + | |||
| + | Runyankore-Rukiga is a Bantu languages spoken in Uganda.   | ||
| + | The negative particle is ''ti''. This prefix can occur attached to a pronoun which agrees anaphorically or cataphorically  | ||
| + | with a noun to express negation of noun phrases:  | ||
| + | |||
| + | <Phrase>10705</Phrase>  | ||
| + | |||
| + | sry, have to look up the noun class :(, but otherwise we see that the fusion of negation and pronominal elements. Its function in RR is   | ||
| + | not to express pronoun negation, that is 'not-them',  but rather to mediate nominal negation for a nominal that they 'phorically' relate to.  | ||
| + | --[[User:Dorothee Beermann|Dorothee]] 18:20, 16 December 2009 (UTC)  | ||
Revision as of 18:20, 16 December 2009
On negative marking in Konkomba
Is there a grammatical term for a lexical entry made up of two different parts of speech fused together? Could we call it a 'negative conjunction', or is there a more technical term?
I would suggest to annotate kaa and baa as follows:
| Kaa | |
| k | aa | 
| NEG | |
| CONJ | |
| baa | |
| b | aa | 
| 3PL | NEG | 
| PN | |
At the point were TypeCraft will allow to record base forms of words and morphemes it will also be possible to add that k has the base form ki and b
has the base form bi.
--Dorothee 18:06, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Negative Marking in Runyankore-Rukiga
Runyankore-Rukiga is a Bantu languages spoken in Uganda. The negative particle is ti. This prefix can occur attached to a pronoun which agrees anaphorically or cataphorically with a noun to express negation of noun phrases:
| tikyo | |
| ti | kyo | 
| NEG | 3SG | 
| PN | |
| kirabyo | 
| kirabyo | 
| flower | 
| N | 
sry, have to look up the noun class :(, but otherwise we see that the fusion of negation and pronominal elements. Its function in RR is 
not to express pronoun negation, that is 'not-them',  but rather to mediate nominal negation for a nominal that they 'phorically' relate to.
--Dorothee 18:20, 16 December 2009 (UTC)