Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Multi-verb constructions in Edo"

(Created page with 'You explained in detail multi-verb constructions in Edo with the information of argument sharing and thematic relations, which is intuitive. However, the examples he provided in …')
 
Line 1: Line 1:
You explained in detail multi-verb constructions in Edo with the information of argument sharing and thematic relations, which is intuitive. However, the examples he provided in TC database are all from Bini language rather than Edo. The template of constructions is confused, because the labels and the short lines between labels are unclear. Does that mean there are spaces between every morpheme? Or the tense, aspect, mood, argument sharing and verb nature are showed in one verb?  
+
In this article, Ota Ogie explained in detail multi-verb constructions in Edo with the information of argument sharing and thematic relations, which is intuitive. However, the examples he provided in TC database are all from Bini language rather than Edo. The template of constructions is confused, because the labels and the short lines between labels are unclear. Does that mean there are spaces between every morpheme? Or the tense, aspect, mood, argument sharing and verb nature are showed in one verb?  
It is also good that you gave examples about the three kinds of multi-verb constructions in Edo, which makes the reading easier. But the data is not enough to cover all kinds of multi-verb constructions he mentioned in his article, for example, the V + mood constructions.
+
 
 +
It is good that he gave examples about the three kinds of multi-verb constructions in Edo, which makes the reading easier. But the data is not enough to cover all kinds of multi-verb constructions he mentioned in his article, for example, the V + mood constructions.
  
 
By the way, there is something I don't understand.
 
By the way, there is something I don't understand.
 
1. Do overlapping constructions have something to do with argument sharing?
 
1. Do overlapping constructions have something to do with argument sharing?
 
2. Can the pattern V (P) +V (P) also be called consequential SVC or covert co-ordinate constructions?
 
2. Can the pattern V (P) +V (P) also be called consequential SVC or covert co-ordinate constructions?
3. Can you explain in more detail your claim that the classification of multi-verb constructions in Edo "is dependent on the distribution of the past tense suffix-rV, an infinitival marker yá, a floating anaphor tòbórè 'by him/her/itself ', VP adverbs and argument sharing patterns"?
+
3. Can you explain in more detail your claim that the classification of multi-verb constructions in Edo "is dependent on the distribution of the past tense suffix-rV, an infinitival marker yá, a floating anaphor tòbórè 'by him/her/itself ', VP adverbs and argument sharing patterns"?<ref> Ota Ogie: Multi-verb constructions in Edo. http://typecraft.org/tc2wiki/Multi-verb_constructions_in_Edo.</ref>
 +
 
 +
Then, as for the different types of argument sharing, he didn’t examine his conclusion with concrete examples. And he neither pointed out which exact type of multi-verb constructions the sentences with argument sharing belong to. I suspect it may concern the overlapping constructions you mentioned above.
 +
 
 +
Finally, the title of this article is about the multi-verb constructions in Edo, but the article doesn't focus on this topic and much more about other Benue-Congo languages is discussed.
 +
--[[User:Miaomiao Zhang|Miaomiao Zhang]] 12:37, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
  
As for the different types of argument sharing, you didn’t examine your conclusion with concrete examples. And you neither pointed out which exact type of multi-verb constructions the sentences with argument sharing belong to. I suspect it may concern the overlapping constructions you mentioned above.--[[User:Miaomiao Zhang|Miaomiao Zhang]] 12:37, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
+
=='''References'''==
 +
<references/>

Revision as of 12:52, 20 May 2011

In this article, Ota Ogie explained in detail multi-verb constructions in Edo with the information of argument sharing and thematic relations, which is intuitive. However, the examples he provided in TC database are all from Bini language rather than Edo. The template of constructions is confused, because the labels and the short lines between labels are unclear. Does that mean there are spaces between every morpheme? Or the tense, aspect, mood, argument sharing and verb nature are showed in one verb?

It is good that he gave examples about the three kinds of multi-verb constructions in Edo, which makes the reading easier. But the data is not enough to cover all kinds of multi-verb constructions he mentioned in his article, for example, the V + mood constructions.

By the way, there is something I don't understand. 1. Do overlapping constructions have something to do with argument sharing? 2. Can the pattern V (P) +V (P) also be called consequential SVC or covert co-ordinate constructions? 3. Can you explain in more detail your claim that the classification of multi-verb constructions in Edo "is dependent on the distribution of the past tense suffix-rV, an infinitival marker yá, a floating anaphor tòbórè 'by him/her/itself ', VP adverbs and argument sharing patterns"?[1]

Then, as for the different types of argument sharing, he didn’t examine his conclusion with concrete examples. And he neither pointed out which exact type of multi-verb constructions the sentences with argument sharing belong to. I suspect it may concern the overlapping constructions you mentioned above.

Finally, the title of this article is about the multi-verb constructions in Edo, but the article doesn't focus on this topic and much more about other Benue-Congo languages is discussed. --Miaomiao Zhang 12:37, 20 May 2011 (UTC)



References

  1. Ota Ogie: Multi-verb constructions in Edo. http://typecraft.org/tc2wiki/Multi-verb_constructions_in_Edo.