Typecraft v2.5
Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Annotating Edo"

 
(16 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{Mbox/sandbox}}
 +
 +
Disussion Lars Hellan (LH) and Ota Ogie (OO)
 +
 +
 
Annotations from March 2009:
 
Annotations from March 2009:
  
Line 42: Line 47:
  
  
DRAFT WITH SUGGESTIONS
+
DRAFT WITH SUGGESTIONS 2010
  
1.  sv-v1obIDv2su-v1tr-v1suAg_v1obAff-v2tr-v2obAff-CAUSERESULT (Resultative construction-Switch reference)
+
1.  sv-v1obIDv2su-v1tr-v1suAg_v1obAff-v2intr-v2obAff-CAUSERESULT (Resultative construction-Switch reference)
  
 
sv-v1obIDv2su => sv-v1obIDv2su
 
sv-v1obIDv2su => sv-v1obIDv2su
  
 
v2-int => v2tr '''(here v2 is unaccusative and intransitive) In my analysis in my dissertation it inherits from the type intrans-verb-lxm'''
 
v2-int => v2tr '''(here v2 is unaccusative and intransitive) In my analysis in my dissertation it inherits from the type intrans-verb-lxm'''
 +
 +
 +
'''LH: So then we should say 'v2intr'...
 +
OO: OK I will effect the correction
 +
v1tr-v1suAg_v1obAff-v2tr-v2obAff => v1tr-v1suAg_v1obAff-v2intr-v2obAff'''
  
 
"v1obIDv2su" is for area 2.'''correction done'''
 
"v1obIDv2su" is for area 2.'''correction done'''
Line 59: Line 69:
 
CAP S after 'sv', and 'IDALL' instead of 'ID', in this connection (area 1 of mv). Please apply these two changes in all examples relevant. '''OK'''
 
CAP S after 'sv', and 'IDALL' instead of 'ID', in this connection (area 1 of mv). Please apply these two changes in all examples relevant. '''OK'''
 
<Phrase>2246</Phrase>
 
<Phrase>2246</Phrase>
3.  svSuObIDALLsuAg-v1tr-v2tr-EVENTOVERLAP  (Purpose construction (token subject and object sharing))
+
3.  svSuObIDALLsuAg-v1tr-v1obPrcpt-v2tr-v2obAff-EVENTOVERLAP  (Purpose construction (token subject and object sharing))
  
 
svsuObIDsuAgob => svSuObIDALLsuAg. '''Here, the verbs in series share object tokens but with different thematic roles. I suggest that we include this information in area 2 v1tr-v2tr = v1tr-v1obPrcpt-v2tr-v2obAff. Here I have used the tag Prcpt to indicate the perceived entity  as opposed to the tag Presit that indicates a perceived situation '''
 
svsuObIDsuAgob => svSuObIDALLsuAg. '''Here, the verbs in series share object tokens but with different thematic roles. I suggest that we include this information in area 2 v1tr-v2tr = v1tr-v1obPrcpt-v2tr-v2obAff. Here I have used the tag Prcpt to indicate the perceived entity  as opposed to the tag Presit that indicates a perceived situation '''
 +
 +
'''LH: I agree. Note, though, that IDALL refers to reference identity only, so we can use 'IDALL' also in these cases (3 and 4).
 +
OO: OK correction effected for examples 3 and 4. IDALL included'''
 +
 
<Phrase>2247</Phrase>
 
<Phrase>2247</Phrase>
4.  mvcSuID-v1tr-v1suAg_v1obAff-v2tr-v2suAgsens_v2obAff- CAUSERESULT (Negative resultatives(token subject sharing and different objects))
+
 
 +
4.  mvcSuIDALL-v1tr-v1suAg_v1obAff-v2tr-v2suAgsens_v2obAff- CAUSERESULT (Negative resultatives(token subject sharing and different objects))
  
 
''''''I have not used the tag IDALL here in area 1 because the shared NP subject do not have the same theta role as indicated in area 2.''''''
 
''''''I have not used the tag IDALL here in area 1 because the shared NP subject do not have the same theta role as indicated in area 2.''''''
Line 89: Line 104:
 
8. svSuIDALLsuAg-v1tr-v1obPrcpt-v2tr-v2obAff-EVENTOVERLAP  (Purpose construction (token subject and object sharing))
 
8. svSuIDALLsuAg-v1tr-v1obPrcpt-v2tr-v2obAff-EVENTOVERLAP  (Purpose construction (token subject and object sharing))
  
'''svSuObIDALLsuAgobAff = svSuObIDALLsuAg
+
'''svSuObIDALLsuAgobAff = svSuIDALLsuAg
  
v1tr-v2tr = v1tr-v1obPrcpt-v2trv2obAff'''
+
v1tr-v2tr = v1tr-v1obPrcpt-v2tr-v2obAff'''
  
 
<Phrase>2432</Phrase>
 
<Phrase>2432</Phrase>
Line 109: Line 124:
 
<Phrase>2434</Phrase>
 
<Phrase>2434</Phrase>
  
11. svSuObIDALLsuAgobAffincrem-v1tr-v2intr- EVENTSEQ  (Consequential construction (token subject and object sharing))
+
11. svSuObIDALLsuAgobAffincrem-v1tr-v2tr- EVENTSEQ  (Consequential construction (token subject and object sharing))
 +
'''v1tr-v2intr = v1tr-v2tr'''
  
 
<Phrase>2435</Phrase>
 
<Phrase>2435</Phrase>
Line 121: Line 137:
 
<Phrase>2437</Phrase>
 
<Phrase>2437</Phrase>
  
14. mvcSuIDALLsuAg-v1tr-v1obTh-v2tr-v2obAff-EVENT_INSTR (V+infinitival complement construction ( covert reference subject sharing))
+
14. mvcSuIDALLsuAg-v1tr-v1obTh-v2tr-v2obAff-EVENTINSTR (V+infinitival complement construction ( covert reference subject sharing))
 
''''''icsuIDsuAg = mvcSuIDALLsuAg.
 
''''''icsuIDsuAg = mvcSuIDALLsuAg.
 
Do we label the situation type as EVENTINSTR following the convention we have adopted for the other situation types?''''''
 
Do we label the situation type as EVENTINSTR following the convention we have adopted for the other situation types?''''''
 +
'''EVENTINSTR''' is probably the best, yes
 +
'''OO: correction effected EVENT_INSTR = EVENTINSTR '''
  
 
v1obInstr => v1obTh  (relative to v1, it is a theme)
 
v1obInstr => v1obTh  (relative to v1, it is a theme)
Line 129: Line 147:
 
<Phrase>2438</Phrase>
 
<Phrase>2438</Phrase>
  
15. svSuObIDALLsuAgobAff- v1tr-v2tr-EVENTSEQ  (Consecutive construction (token subject and object sharing))  
+
15. svSuObIDALLsuAgobAff- v1tr-v2tr-EVENTSEQ  (Consecutive construction (token subject and   object sharing))
 +
<Phrase>2439</Phrase>
  
<Phrase>2439</Phrase
+
16. mvcSuIDALLsuAg-v2tr-v2obThincrem-EVENTCOMIT  (V+infinitival complement construction- Instrumental ( covert reference subject sharing)
 
+
16. mvcSuIDALLsuAg-v2tr-v2obThincrem-EVENTCOMIT  (V+infinitival complement construction- Instrumental ( covert reference subject sharing)
+
  
 
'''icsuIDsuAg = mvcSuIDALLsuAg.'''
 
'''icsuIDsuAg = mvcSuIDALLsuAg.'''
Line 150: Line 167:
 
18.svSuIDALLsuAg-v1tr-v1obAffincrem-v2tr-v2obAff-EVENTSEQ  (Consequential construction . V1 predicate focus. (Baker and Stewart 1999))
 
18.svSuIDALLsuAg-v1tr-v1obAffincrem-v2tr-v2obAff-EVENTSEQ  (Consequential construction . V1 predicate focus. (Baker and Stewart 1999))
 
<Phrase>2727</Phrase>
 
<Phrase>2727</Phrase>
 +
 
19. svSuIDALLsuAg-v1tr-v1obAffincrem-v2tr-v2obAff-EVENTSEQ  (Consequential construction. V2 predicate focus. (Baker and Stewart 1999))
 
19. svSuIDALLsuAg-v1tr-v1obAffincrem-v2tr-v2obAff-EVENTSEQ  (Consequential construction. V2 predicate focus. (Baker and Stewart 1999))
  

Latest revision as of 18:40, 16 June 2011

Disussion Lars Hellan (LH) and Ota Ogie (OO)


Annotations from March 2009:

1. Òzó suá Àzàrí dé

2. Òzó lé ìzẹ́ ré

3. Òzó miẹ̣́n àlìmóí kpá!án

4. Òzó gá ẹ̣̣̣́bọ̣̣̣̀ miẹ̣̣̣́n òkán

5. Òzó dẹ̣̣̣̣́ ìzẹ̣̣̣̣̣́ rrí ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré

6. Òzó lé ízẹ̣̣̣̣̀ kpòló òwá

7. Íràn kùgbé-rè tòbíràn rrí ízẹ̣̣̣̣̀

8. Òzó miẹ̣̣̣̣́n àkhé guọ̣̣̣̣́!ghọ̣̣̣̣́

9. Òzó kòkó Àdésúwà mòsé

10. Òzó dẹ̣̣̣̣́ ìyán dùnmwún

11. Íràn sá àmẹ̣̣̣̣̀ wọ̣̣̣̣́n

12. Òzó gbọ̣̣̣̣̀ọ̣̣̣̣́ ívìn , bòló òká

13. Òzó rhùlẹ̣̣̣̣́ -rè kpàá

14. Òzó rhìé ẹ̣̣̣̣̀hò fián ávbé àlímóí

15. Òzó lé ìzẹ̣̣̣̣̣́ khiẹ̣̣̣̣́n

16. Íràn kùgbé-rè kó!kó ìzẹ̣̣̣̣̣́

17. Òzó rhùlé ̣rè làọ̣̣̣̣́ òwá

18. Ù-lé -mwẹ̣̣̣̣̀n ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré Úyi lé èvbárè khiẹ̣̣̣̣́n

19. Ù-khiẹ̣̣̣̣́n-mwẹ̣̣̣̣̀n ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré Úyi lé èvbárè khiẹ̣̣̣̣́n

20. Òzó viẹ̣̣̣̣́rè fòó


DRAFT WITH SUGGESTIONS 2010

1. sv-v1obIDv2su-v1tr-v1suAg_v1obAff-v2intr-v2obAff-CAUSERESULT (Resultative construction-Switch reference)

sv-v1obIDv2su => sv-v1obIDv2su

v2-int => v2tr (here v2 is unaccusative and intransitive) In my analysis in my dissertation it inherits from the type intrans-verb-lxm


LH: So then we should say 'v2intr'... OO: OK I will effect the correction v1tr-v1suAg_v1obAff-v2tr-v2obAff => v1tr-v1suAg_v1obAff-v2intr-v2obAff

"v1obIDv2su" is for area 2.correction done

Òzó suá Àzàrí dé
“Ozo pushed Azari down”
̱̱̱̱Òzó
̱̱̱̱òzó
OzoSBJAGT
Np
suá
suá
pushPASTH
Vtr
Àzàrí
àzàrí
Azari.AFFDO
Np
fallPASTH
Vitr


2. svSuObIDALLsuAgobAff-v1tr-v2tr-EVENTSEQ (Consequential construction (token subject and object sharing)) svsuObIDsuAgobAff => svSuObIDALLsuAgobAff

CAP S after 'sv', and 'IDALL' instead of 'ID', in this connection (area 1 of mv). Please apply these two changes in all examples relevant. OK

Òzó lé ìzẹ́ ré
“Ozo cooked rice and ate”
Òzó
òzó
OzoSBJAGT
Np
cookPASTH
Vtr
ìzẹ́
ìzẹ́
riceDOTH
CN
eatPASTH
Vtr

3. svSuObIDALLsuAg-v1tr-v1obPrcpt-v2tr-v2obAff-EVENTOVERLAP (Purpose construction (token subject and object sharing))

svsuObIDsuAgob => svSuObIDALLsuAg. Here, the verbs in series share object tokens but with different thematic roles. I suggest that we include this information in area 2 v1tr-v2tr = v1tr-v1obPrcpt-v2tr-v2obAff. Here I have used the tag Prcpt to indicate the perceived entity as opposed to the tag Presit that indicates a perceived situation

LH: I agree. Note, though, that IDALL refers to reference identity only, so we can use 'IDALL' also in these cases (3 and 4). OO: OK correction effected for examples 3 and 4. IDALL included

Òzó miẹ̣́n àlìmóí kpá!án
“Ozo saw an orange to pluck”
Òzó
òzó
OzoSBJAGT
Np
miẹ̣́n
miẹ̣́n
seePASTH
Vtr
àlìmóí
àlìmóí
orangeDO
CN
kpá!án
kpá!án
pluck
Vtr


4. mvcSuIDALL-v1tr-v1suAg_v1obAff-v2tr-v2suAgsens_v2obAff- CAUSERESULT (Negative resultatives(token subject sharing and different objects))

'I have not used the tag IDALL here in area 1 because the shared NP subject do not have the same theta role as indicated in area 2.'

Should be 'sv'.Negative resultatives are not svs calling them that may be misleading. I suggest we use the tag mvc -multi verb constructions- for these construction types. Area 1 nrcsuID = mvcsuID

Sure this is CAUSE_RESULT? during our discussion we considered labeling the situation type as an EventSEQ but the event depicted by v1 brings about the resultant state in v2 and tests I applied to this construction type in my thesis show that there is a causation relation linking v1 and v2.

Òzó gá ẹ̣̣̣́bọ̣̣̣̀ miẹ̣̣̣́n òkán
“Ozo got trouble as his reward for serving gods”
Òzó
òzó
OzoSBJAGT
Np
servePASTH
Vtr
ẹ̣̣̣́bò
ẹ̣̣̣́bò
Gods.AFFDO
CN
miẹ̣̣̣́n
miẹ̣̣̣́n
recievePASTH
Vtr
òkán
òkán
trouble.AFFDO
N


5. ccSuIDALLsuAg-v1tr-v1obAff-v2tr-v2obThincrem-EVENTSEQ (Covert Co-ordination (covert reference subject sharing and overt reference object sharing)) ccsuIDsuAg = ccSuIDALLsuAg

Òzó dẹ̣̣̣̣́ ìzẹ̣̣̣̣̣́ rrí ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré
“Ozo bought rice and ate it”
Òzó
òzó
OzoSBJAGT
Np
dẹ̣̣̣̣́
dẹ̣̣̣̣́
buyPASTH
Vtr
ìzẹ̣̣̣̣̣́
ìzẹ̣̣̣̣̣́
rice.AFFDO
CN
rrí
rrí
eatPASTH
Vtr
ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré
ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré
it3SGACCDOTH
PN


6. ccSuIDALLsuAg-v1tr-v1obAff-v2tr-v2obAff- EVENTSEQ (Covert Co-ordination (covert reference subject sharing and different objects)) ccsuIDsuAg = ccSuIDALLsuAg.

Òzó lé ízẹ̣̣̣̣̀ kpòló òwá
“Ozo cooked the rice and swept the house”
Òzó
òzó
OzoSBJAGT
Np
cookPASTH
Vtr
ízẹ̣̣̣̣̀
ízẹ̣̣̣̣̀
rice.AffDO
CN
kpòló
kpòló
sweepPASTH
Vtr
òwá
òwá
house.AffDO
CN


7.mvcSuIDALLsuAg-v2tr-v2obThincrem-EVENTOVERLAP (Comitative construction (covert reference subject sharing)) 'svsuIDsuAg = mvcSuIDALLsuAg. The construction type is not an svc. I have therefor used the tag mvc.'

Íràn kùgbé-rè tòbíràn rrí ízẹ̣̣̣̣̀
“They ate the rice together by themselves”
Íràn
íràn
They3PLNOMSBJAGT
Np
kùgbérè
kùgbé-rè
jointogetherPASTRT
Vtr
tòbíràn
tòbíràn
by.themselves3PLREFLACC
 
rrí
rrí
eat
Vtr
ízẹ̣̣̣̣̀
ízẹ̣̣̣̣̀
riceDOTH
CN


8. svSuIDALLsuAg-v1tr-v1obPrcpt-v2tr-v2obAff-EVENTOVERLAP (Purpose construction (token subject and object sharing))

svSuObIDALLsuAgobAff = svSuIDALLsuAg

v1tr-v2tr = v1tr-v1obPrcpt-v2tr-v2obAff

Òzó miẹ̣̣̣̣́n àkhé guọ̣̣̣̣́!ghọ̣̣̣̣́
“Ozo saw a pot to break”
Òzó
òzó
OzoSBJAGT
Np
miẹ̣̣̣̣́n
miẹ̣̣̣̣́n
seePASTH
Vtr
àkhé
àkhé
pot.AFFDO
CN
guọ̣̣̣̣́!ghọ̣̣̣̣́
guọ̣̣̣̣́!ghọ̣̣̣̣́
break
Vtr


9. sv-v1obIDv2su-v1tr-v1suAg-v1obAff-v2int-v2obAff-CAUSERESULT (Resultative construction (switch reference))

svv1obIDv2su => sv-v1obIDv2su

v2-int => v2tr see comment for example 1 above.

Òzó kòkó Àdésúwà mòsé
“Ozo raised Adesuwa to be beautiful”
Òzó
òzó
OzoSBJAGT
Np
kòkó
kòkó
raisePAST
Vtr
Àdésúwà
àdésúwà
Adesuwa.AFFDO
Np
mòsé
mòsé
be.beautifulPAST
Vitr


10. svSuIDALLsuAg- v1tr-v1obTh-v2tr-v2obAffincrem-EVENTSEQ (Consequential construction (token subject and object sharing))

v2obAffThincrem => v2obAffincrem (same in 11)

Òzó dẹ̣̣̣̣́ ìyán dùnmwún
“Ozo bought yam and pounded (it)”
Òzó
òzó
OzoSBJAGT
Np
dẹ̣̣̣̣́
dẹ̣̣̣̣́
buyPAST
Vtr
ìyán
ìyán
yamDO
CN
dùnmwún
dùnmwún
poundPAST
Vtr


11. svSuObIDALLsuAgobAffincrem-v1tr-v2tr- EVENTSEQ (Consequential construction (token subject and object sharing)) v1tr-v2intr = v1tr-v2tr

Íràn sá àmẹ̣̣̣̣̀ wọ̣̣̣̣́n
“They fetched water and drank”
Íràn
íràn
They3PLNOMSBJAGT
Np
fetchPASTH
Vtr
àmẹ̣̣̣̣̀
àmẹ̣̣̣̣̀
water.AFFDO
CN
wọ̣̣̣̣́n
wọ̣̣̣̣́n
drinkPASTH
Vtr


12. ccSuIDALLsuAg-v1tr-v1obAff-v2tr-v2obThincrem- EVENTSEQ (Covert Co-ordination (covert reference subject sharing and different objects)) svsuIDsuAg = ccSuIDALLsuAg.

Òzó gbọ̣̣̣̣̀ọ̣̣̣̣́ ívìn , bòló òká
“Ozo planted cooconut and peeled corn”
Òzó
òzó
OzoSBJAGT
Np
gbọ̣̣̣̣̀ọ̣̣̣̣́
gbọ̣̣̣̣̀ọ̣̣̣̣́
plantPASTH
Vtr
ívìn
ívìn
coconut.AFFDO
CN
,bòló
,bòló
peelPASTH
Vtr
òká
òká
cornDOTH
CN


13. v-intr-suAg-ACHVMNT-MOTION_DIRECTED ( V+modifier construction (V2 is reanalyzed as adverb) movement is away from the speaker)

Òzó rhùlẹ̣̣̣̣́ -rè kpàá
“Ozo ran away”
Òzó
òzó
OzoSBJAGT
Np
rhùlẹ̣̣̣̣́ -rè
rhùlẹ̣̣̣̣́
runPASTRT
Vitr
kpàá
kpàá
leave.V>ADV
ADVm


14. mvcSuIDALLsuAg-v1tr-v1obTh-v2tr-v2obAff-EVENTINSTR (V+infinitival complement construction ( covert reference subject sharing)) 'icsuIDsuAg = mvcSuIDALLsuAg. Do we label the situation type as EVENTINSTR following the convention we have adopted for the other situation types?' EVENTINSTR is probably the best, yes OO: correction effected EVENT_INSTR = EVENTINSTR

v1obInstr => v1obTh (relative to v1, it is a theme)

Òzó rhìé ẹ̣̣̣̣̀hò fián ávbé àlímóí
“Ozo cut the oranges with a knife”
Òzó
òzó
OzoSBJAGT
Np
rhìé
rhìé
takeIVH
Vtr
ẹ̣̣̣̣̀hò
ẹ̣̣̣̣̀hò
knifeDOTH
N
fián
fián
cut
Vtr
àvbé
àvbé
PL
DET
àlímóí
àlímóí
orange.AFFDO
N


15. svSuObIDALLsuAgobAff- v1tr-v2tr-EVENTSEQ (Consecutive construction (token subject and object sharing))

Òzó lé ìzẹ̣̣̣̣̣́ khiẹ̣̣̣̣́n
“Ozo cooked rice and sold”
Òzó
òzó
OzoSBJAGT
Np
cookIVH
V
ìzẹ̣̣̣̣̣́
ìzẹ̣̣̣̣̣́
rice.AFFDO
N
khiẹ̣̣̣̣́n
khiẹ̣̣̣̣́n
sellIVH
V


16. mvcSuIDALLsuAg-v2tr-v2obThincrem-EVENTCOMIT (V+infinitival complement construction- Instrumental ( covert reference subject sharing)

icsuIDsuAg = mvcSuIDALLsuAg.

EVENTCOMMT => EVENTCOMIT

Íràn kùgbé-rè kó!kó ìzẹ̣̣̣̣̣́
“They joined together and gathered the rice”
Íràn
íràn
3PLNOMSBJAGT
PN
kùgbérè
kùgbé
joinIVRT
Vtr
kó!kó
kó!kó
gather
Vtr
ìzẹ̣̣̣̣̣́
ìzẹ̣̣̣̣̣́
riceDOTH
N


17. v-intrObl-suAg-ACHVMNT-MOTION_DIRECTED (V+modifier construction- locational construction ( V2 is reanalyzed as an adverb))

vintrOblsuAg => v-intrObl-suAg (the compacting is only for multiverbs)

Òzó rhùlé ̣rè làọ̣̣̣̣́ òwá
“Ozo ran into the house”
Òzó
òzó
ozoSBJAGT
Np
rhùlẹ̣̣̣̣́rè
rhùlẹ̣̣̣̣́
runIVRT
Vitr
làọ̣̣̣̣́
làọ̣̣̣̣́
enter.V>P
PREP
òwá
òwá
houseGOAL
N


18.svSuIDALLsuAg-v1tr-v1obAffincrem-v2tr-v2obAff-EVENTSEQ (Consequential construction . V1 predicate focus. (Baker and Stewart 1999))

Ù-lé -mwẹ̣̣̣̣̀n ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré Úyi lé èvbárè khiẹ̣̣̣̣́n
“It`s cooking that Ozo did to the food and sold it”
Ù-lé -mwẹ̣̣̣̣̀n
ùmwẹ̣̣̣̣̀n
gerund.circumfixcookVstemgerund.circumfix
N
ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré
ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré
FOC
 
Úyi
úyi
UyiSBJAGT
Np
cookIVH
Vtr
èvbárè
èvbárè
foodDO
CN
khiẹ̣̣̣̣́n
khiẹ̣̣̣̣́n
sellIVH
Vtr


19. svSuIDALLsuAg-v1tr-v1obAffincrem-v2tr-v2obAff-EVENTSEQ (Consequential construction. V2 predicate focus. (Baker and Stewart 1999))

v1obAffThincrem => v1obAffincrem (same in 20)

Ù-khiẹ̣̣̣̣́n-mwẹ̣̣̣̣̀n ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré Úyi lé èvbárè khiẹ̣̣̣̣́n
“It`s selling that Uyi cooked the food and did to it”
Ù-khiẹ̣̣̣̣́n-mwẹ̣̣̣̣̀n
ùkhiẹ̣̣̣̣́nmwẹ̣̣̣̣̀n
gerund.circumfixsellVstemgerund.circumfix
N
ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré
ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré
FOC
 
Úyi
úyi
UyiSBJAGT
Np
cookIVH
Vtr
èvbárè
èvbárè
food.DO
CN
khiẹ̣̣̣̣́n
khiẹ̣̣̣̣́n
sellIVH
Vtr


20. v-intr-suAg-STATE (V+modifier construction)

vintrsuAg => v-intr-suAg

Òzó viẹ̣̣̣̣́rè fòó
“Ozo finished crying”
Òzó
òzó
OzoSBJAGT
Np
viẹ̣̣̣̣́rè
viẹ̣̣̣̣́
cryIVRT
Vitr
fòó
fòó
finish.V>ADV
ADVm






COPY USED FOR DISCUSSION


1. sv-v1objIDv2su-v1tr-v1suAg_v1obAff-v2-int-v2obAff- CAUSE_RESULT (Resultative construction-Switch reference)

Òzó suá Àzàrí dé
“Ozo pushed Azari down”
̱̱̱̱Òzó
̱̱̱̱òzó
OzoSBJAGT
Np
suá
suá
pushPASTH
Vtr
Àzàrí
àzàrí
Azari.AFFDO
Np
fallPASTH
Vitr

2. sv_suObID_suAg_obAFF-v1tr-v2tr-CAUSE_RESULT (Consequential construction (token subject and object sharing))

Òzó lé ìzẹ́ ré
“Ozo cooked rice and ate”
Òzó
òzó
OzoSBJAGT
Np
cookPASTH
Vtr
ìzẹ́
ìzẹ́
riceDOTH
CN
eatPASTH
Vtr

3. sv_suObID_suAg_obAFF-v1tr-v2tr- CAUSE_RESULT (Purpose construction (token subject and object sharing))

Òzó miẹ̣́n àlìmóí kpá!án
“Ozo saw an orange to pluck”
Òzó
òzó
OzoSBJAGT
Np
miẹ̣́n
miẹ̣́n
seePASTH
Vtr
àlìmóí
àlìmóí
orangeDO
CN
kpá!án
kpá!án
pluck
Vtr

4. nrc_suID- v1tr-v1su-Ag_v1obAff-v2tr-v2suAgsens_v2obAff- CAUSE_RESULT (Negative resultatives(token subject sharing and different objects))

Òzó gá ẹ̣̣̣́bọ̣̣̣̀ miẹ̣̣̣́n òkán
“Ozo got trouble as his reward for serving gods”
Òzó
òzó
OzoSBJAGT
Np
servePASTH
Vtr
ẹ̣̣̣́bò
ẹ̣̣̣́bò
Gods.AFFDO
CN
miẹ̣̣̣́n
miẹ̣̣̣́n
recievePASTH
Vtr
òkán
òkán
trouble.AFFDO
N

5. cc_suID_suAg_ v1tr-v1obAff-v2tr-v2obThincrem- CAUSE_RESULT (Covert Co-ordination (covert reference subject sharing and overt reference object sharing))

Òzó dẹ̣̣̣̣́ ìzẹ̣̣̣̣̣́ rrí ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré
“Ozo bought rice and ate it”
Òzó
òzó
OzoSBJAGT
Np
dẹ̣̣̣̣́
dẹ̣̣̣̣́
buyPASTH
Vtr
ìzẹ̣̣̣̣̣́
ìzẹ̣̣̣̣̣́
rice.AFFDO
CN
rrí
rrí
eatPASTH
Vtr
ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré
ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré
it3SGACCDOTH
PN

6. sv_suID_suAg_ v1tr-v1obAff-v2tr-v2obAff- CAUSE_RESULT (Covert Co-ordination (covert reference subject sharing and different objects))

Òzó lé ízẹ̣̣̣̣̀ kpòló òwá
“Ozo cooked the rice and swept the house”
Òzó
òzó
OzoSBJAGT
Np
cookPASTH
Vtr
ízẹ̣̣̣̣̀
ízẹ̣̣̣̣̀
rice.AffDO
CN
kpòló
kpòló
sweepPASTH
Vtr
òwá
òwá
house.AffDO
CN

7. sv_suID_suAg-v2tr-v2obThincrem-CAUSE_RESULT (Comitative construction (covert reference subject sharing))

Íràn kùgbé-rè tòbíràn rrí ízẹ̣̣̣̣̀
“They ate the rice together by themselves”
Íràn
íràn
They3PLNOMSBJAGT
Np
kùgbérè
kùgbé-rè
jointogetherPASTRT
Vtr
tòbíràn
tòbíràn
by.themselves3PLREFLACC
 
rrí
rrí
eat
Vtr
ízẹ̣̣̣̣̀
ízẹ̣̣̣̣̀
riceDOTH
CN

8. sv_suObID_suAg_obAFF-v1tr-v2tr-CAUSE_RESULT (Purpose construction (token subject and object sharing))

Òzó miẹ̣̣̣̣́n àkhé guọ̣̣̣̣́!ghọ̣̣̣̣́
“Ozo saw a pot to break”
Òzó
òzó
OzoSBJAGT
Np
miẹ̣̣̣̣́n
miẹ̣̣̣̣́n
seePASTH
Vtr
àkhé
àkhé
pot.AFFDO
CN
guọ̣̣̣̣́!ghọ̣̣̣̣́
guọ̣̣̣̣́!ghọ̣̣̣̣́
break
Vtr

9. sv-v1objIDv2su-v1tr-v1suAg-v1obAff-v2-int-v2obAff-CAUSE_RESULT (Resultative construction (switch reference))

Òzó kòkó Àdésúwà mòsé
“Ozo raised Adesuwa to be beautiful”
Òzó
òzó
OzoSBJAGT
Np
kòkó
kòkó
raisePAST
Vtr
Àdésúwà
àdésúwà
Adesuwa.AFFDO
Np
mòsé
mòsé
be.beautifulPAST
Vitr

10. sv_suID_suAg_ v1tr-v1obAff-v2tr-v2obThincrem-CAUSE_RESULT (Consequential construction (token subject and object sharing))

Òzó dẹ̣̣̣̣́ ìyán dùnmwún
“Ozo bought yam and pounded (it)”
Òzó
òzó
OzoSBJAGT
Np
dẹ̣̣̣̣́
dẹ̣̣̣̣́
buyPAST
Vtr
ìyán
ìyán
yamDO
CN
dùnmwún
dùnmwún
poundPAST
Vtr

11. sv_suObID_suAg_obThincrem-v1tr-v2intr- CAUSE_RESULT (Consequential construction (token subject and object sharing))

Íràn sá àmẹ̣̣̣̣̀ wọ̣̣̣̣́n
“They fetched water and drank”
Íràn
íràn
They3PLNOMSBJAGT
Np
fetchPASTH
Vtr
àmẹ̣̣̣̣̀
àmẹ̣̣̣̣̀
water.AFFDO
CN
wọ̣̣̣̣́n
wọ̣̣̣̣́n
drinkPASTH
Vtr

12. sv_suID_suAg_ v1tr-v1obAff-v2tr-v2obThincrem- CAUSE_RESULT (Covert Co-ordination (covert reference subject sharing and different objects))

Òzó gbọ̣̣̣̣̀ọ̣̣̣̣́ ívìn , bòló òká
“Ozo planted cooconut and peeled corn”
Òzó
òzó
OzoSBJAGT
Np
gbọ̣̣̣̣̀ọ̣̣̣̣́
gbọ̣̣̣̣̀ọ̣̣̣̣́
plantPASTH
Vtr
ívìn
ívìn
coconut.AFFDO
CN
,bòló
,bòló
peelPASTH
Vtr
òká
òká
cornDOTH
CN

13. mc-vintr_suAg-ACHVMNT-MOTION_DIRECTED ( V+modifier construction (V2 is reanalyzed as adverb) movement is away from the speaker)

Òzó rhùlẹ̣̣̣̣́ -rè kpàá
“Ozo ran away”
Òzó
òzó
OzoSBJAGT
Np
rhùlẹ̣̣̣̣́ -rè
rhùlẹ̣̣̣̣́
runPASTRT
Vitr
kpàá
kpàá
leave.V>ADV
ADVm

14. ic_suID_suAg-v1tr-v1obAff-v2tr-v2obAff-CUTTING (V+infinitival complement construction ( covert reference subject sharing))

Òzó rhìé ẹ̣̣̣̣̀hò fián ávbé àlímóí
“Ozo cut the oranges with a knife”
Òzó
òzó
OzoSBJAGT
Np
rhìé
rhìé
takeIVH
Vtr
ẹ̣̣̣̣̀hò
ẹ̣̣̣̣̀hò
knifeDOTH
N
fián
fián
cut
Vtr
àvbé
àvbé
PL
DET
àlímóí
àlímóí
orange.AFFDO
N

15. sv_suObID_suAg_obAff- v1tr-v2tr-TRANSFER (Consecutive construction (token subject and object sharing))

Òzó lé ìzẹ̣̣̣̣̣́ khiẹ̣̣̣̣́n
“Ozo cooked rice and sold”
Òzó
òzó
OzoSBJAGT
Np
cookIVH
V
ìzẹ̣̣̣̣̣́
ìzẹ̣̣̣̣̣́
rice.AFFDO
N
khiẹ̣̣̣̣́n
khiẹ̣̣̣̣́n
sellIVH
V

16. ic_suID_suAg-v2tr-v2obThincrem-CAUSE_RESULT (V+infinitival complement construction- Instrumental ( covert reference subject sharing))

Íràn kùgbé-rè kó!kó ìzẹ̣̣̣̣̣́
“They joined together and gathered the rice”
Íràn
íràn
3PLNOMSBJAGT
PN
kùgbérè
kùgbé
joinIVRT
Vtr
kó!kó
kó!kó
gather
Vtr
ìzẹ̣̣̣̣̣́
ìzẹ̣̣̣̣̣́
riceDOTH
N

17. mc-vintr_suAg-ACHVMNT-MOTION_DIRECTED (V+modifier construction- locational construction ( V2 is reanalyzed as an adverb))

Òzó rhùlé ̣rè làọ̣̣̣̣́ òwá
“Ozo ran into the house”
Òzó
òzó
ozoSBJAGT
Np
rhùlẹ̣̣̣̣́rè
rhùlẹ̣̣̣̣́
runIVRT
Vitr
làọ̣̣̣̣́
làọ̣̣̣̣́
enter.V>P
PREP
òwá
òwá
houseGOAL
N

18. sv-v1objIDv2su-v1tr-v1suAg_v1obAff-v2-intr-v2obAff- CAUSE_RESULT (Resultative construction. V1 predicate focus (Baker and Stewart 1999))

 ??Ú-fí- mwẹ̣̣̣̣̀n ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré ọ̣̣̣̣̀ fí akhe gìẹ̣̣̣̣́gìẹ̣̣̣̣́ guọ̣̣̣̣̀ghọ̣̣̣̣́
“??Its by throwing that he made the pot break (not by striking it)”
??Ú-fí-mwẹ̣̣̣̣̀n
??úmwẹ̣̣̣̣̀n
gerund.circumfixthrowVstemgerund.circumfix
N
ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré
ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré
FOC
 
ọ̣̣̣̣̀
ọ̣̣̣̣̀
3SGNOMSBJAGT
PN
throwIVH
Vtr
àkhé
àkhé
pot.AFFDO
CN
gìẹ̣̣̣̣́gìẹ̣̣̣̣́
gìẹ̣̣̣̣́gìẹ̣̣̣̣́
quickly
ADVm
guọ̣̣̣̣̀ghọ̣̣̣̣́
guọ̣̣̣̣̀ghọ̣̣̣̣́
breakIVH
Vitr

19. sv-v1objIDv2su-v1tr-v1suAg_v1obAff-v2-intr-v2obAff- CAUSE_RESULT (Resultative construction. V2 predicate focus (Baker and Stewart 1999))

*Ú-ghọ̣̣̣̣́!ghọ̣̣̣̣̀-mwẹ̣̣̣̣̀n ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré Òzó fí àkhé gìẹ̣̣̣̣́gìẹ̣̣̣̣́ guọ̣̣̣̣̀ghọ̣̣̣̣́
“*It`s breaking Ozo threw the pot and it did”
*Ú-ghọ̣̣̣̣́!ghọ̣̣̣̣̀-mwẹ̣̣̣̣̀n
ghọ̣̣̣̣́!ghọ̣̣̣̣̀mwẹ̣̣̣̣̀n
gerund.circunfixbreakVstemgerund.circumfix
N
ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré
ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré
FOC
 
Òzó
òzó
OzoSBJAGT
Np
throwIVH
Vtr
àkhé
àkhé
pot.AFFDO
CN
gìẹ̣̣̣̣́gìé
gìẹ̣̣̣̣́gìé
quickly
ADVm
guọ̣̣̣̣̀ghọ̣̣̣̣́
guọ̣̣̣̣̀ghọ̣̣̣̣́
breakIVH
Vitr

20. sv_suID_suAg_ v1tr-v1obThincrem-v2tr-v2obAff-TRANSFER (Consequential construction . V1 predicate focus. (Baker and Stewart 1999))

Ù-lé -mwẹ̣̣̣̣̀n ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré Úyi lé èvbárè khiẹ̣̣̣̣́n
“It`s cooking that Ozo did to the food and sold it”
Ù-lé -mwẹ̣̣̣̣̀n
ùmwẹ̣̣̣̣̀n
gerund.circumfixcookVstemgerund.circumfix
N
ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré
ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré
FOC
 
Úyi
úyi
UyiSBJAGT
Np
cookIVH
Vtr
èvbárè
èvbárè
foodDO
CN
khiẹ̣̣̣̣́n
khiẹ̣̣̣̣́n
sellIVH
Vtr

21. sv_suID_suAg_ v1tr-v1obTh-v2tr-v2obAff-TRANSFER (Consequential construction. V2 predicate focus. (Baker and Stewart 1999))

Ù-khiẹ̣̣̣̣́n-mwẹ̣̣̣̣̀n ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré Úyi lé èvbárè khiẹ̣̣̣̣́n
“It`s selling that Uyi cooked the food and did to it”
Ù-khiẹ̣̣̣̣́n-mwẹ̣̣̣̣̀n
ùkhiẹ̣̣̣̣́nmwẹ̣̣̣̣̀n
gerund.circumfixsellVstemgerund.circumfix
N
ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré
ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré
FOC
 
Úyi
úyi
UyiSBJAGT
Np
cookIVH
Vtr
èvbárè
èvbárè
food.DO
CN
khiẹ̣̣̣̣́n
khiẹ̣̣̣̣́n
sellIVH
Vtr

22. mc-vintr_suAg-STATE (V+modifier construction)

Òzó viẹ̣̣̣̣́rè fòó
“Ozo finished crying”
Òzó
òzó
OzoSBJAGT
Np
viẹ̣̣̣̣́rè
viẹ̣̣̣̣́
cryIVRT
Vitr
fòó
fòó
finish.V>ADV
ADVm