Help
Add this page to your book
Show book (0 pages)
Suggest pagesDifference between revisions of "Annotating Tumbuka"
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
|5||Object marker|| || | |5||Object marker|| || | ||
|-style="color:brown" | |-style="color:brown" | ||
| − | |6||Derivation|| || | + | |6||Extension (Derivation)|| || |
|-style="color:brown" | |-style="color:brown" | ||
|7||Tense & Aspect || || | |7||Tense & Aspect || || | ||
Revision as of 09:26, 12 July 2008
THIS PAGE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
One of the challenges in glossing a Bantu language is the representation of the verb and its affixes. Bantu languages are agglutinating, and a verb in Chichewa can be preceded by several prefixes, and it can be followed by up to 3 suffixes. Suffixes can be followed by the end-clitics -nsóand -bé One way of representing verb affixation is through the use of verb schemata where the verb root is accompanied by slots (SLT) each of which hosts one or several affixes of a specific grammatical type.
| (NEG) | SUBJ.M | TA1 | (MOD) | (OM) | ROOT | (EXT) | (TA2) | FV |
| SLT1 | SLT2 | SLT3 | SLT4 | SLT5 | SLT6 | SLT7 | SLT8 | SLT9 |
Note that only the subject marker (expressing noun class agreement) a tense/aspect marker, both preceding the root
and a final vowel are obligatory, all other verb extensions are optional. The subject marker has a dual functional status; in case of
a realised subject it functions as an agreement marker,otherwise as an incorporated pronominal argument (see (Bresnan and Mchombo 1986, 1987)
.
| Slot | Suffix | Example | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Negation | ||
| 2 | Subject agreement or Subject pro-form | ||
| 3 | Tense & Aspect | ||
| 4 | Modification | ||
| 5 | Object marker | ||
| 6 | Extension (Derivation) | ||
| 7 | Tense & Aspect | ||
| 8 | Final Vowel (Mood) |