Difference between revisions of "Grammar Squib - The Complex Passive in Danish"
(→Complex Passives in Danish) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== '''Complex Passives in Danish''' == | == '''Complex Passives in Danish''' == | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| border="1" | ||
| + | ! colspan="2"|'''Abstract Template''' | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |Template|||NP (aux) Vmatrix Vcomplement* (PP) (ADV) | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |Template with expletive subject | ||
| + | |EXPL (aux) Vmatrix Vcomplement* (NPindefinite)or(PP)) (ADV) | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | {| border="1" | ||
| + | ! colspan="3"|'''Characteristics of the respective verbs''' | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |||Matrix verb||Verbal complement | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |Voice||passive||Passive past participle | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |Changes to the citation form||Suffix -t ......||Suffix -t | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |Relation to the subject of the construction||SUBJ is '''not''' a thematic argument||SUBJ is a thematic argument | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
[[File:Example.jpg]] | [[File:Example.jpg]] | ||
Revision as of 11:21, 7 June 2010
Complex Passives in Danish
| Abstract Template | |
|---|---|
| Template | NP (aux) Vmatrix Vcomplement* (PP) (ADV) |
| Template with expletive subject | EXPL (aux) Vmatrix Vcomplement* (NPindefinite)or(PP)) (ADV) |
| Characteristics of the respective verbs | ||
|---|---|---|
| Matrix verb | Verbal complement | |
| Voice | passive | Passive past participle |
| Changes to the citation form | Suffix -t ...... | Suffix -t |
| Relation to the subject of the construction | SUBJ is not a thematic argument | SUBJ is a thematic argument |
Bibliography:
Ørsnes, B., 2006. Creating Raising Verbs - An LFG-analysis of the Complex Passive in Danish, CSLI online publications
Falk, Y.N., 2001. Lexical-Functional Grammar: An Introduction to Parallel Constraint-Based Syntax, Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.
Complex Passive constructions
The following sentences are examples of Danish complex passive constructions, gathered by introspection.
Differences between complex passives in Norwegian and Danish
In Norwegian the active participles used in complex passives have the same argument structure as their corresponding nominal modifiers. Løpt as a two-place predicate occurs in complex passive constructions and as a pre-nominal modifier in Norwegian. The intransitive verb løpt does neither occur as pre-nominal modifier, nor in complex passives.
Participles in the Danish complex passives are always past participles, and they do not occur as pre-nominal modifiers. The Danish intransitive løbet can be used in a complex passive construction, but it never occurs as a pre-nominal modifier. Further, I doubt that a Danish two place predicate like løbet is allowed in complex passives, unless the DIR-argument is a predicate itself with its own argument structure.
Norwegian: løpt [AGENT,DIR] løpt [AGENT]
Danish: løbet [AGENT,DIR] løbet [AGENT]
In Norwegian, participles based on unaccusative verbs are allowed in complex passive constructions. This is not the case in Danish.
Bibliography:
Lars Hellan, L., 2001. Complex Passive Constructions in Norwegian, Manuscript, NTNU.
Ørsnes, B., 2006. Creating Raising Verbs - An LFG-analysis of the Complex Passive in Danish, CSLI online publications.