Difference between revisions of ""Future Present Progressive in Brazilian Portuguese""
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
}} | }} | ||
| + | ==Master Thesis's Synopsis== | ||
| − | + | '''! Full text to appear...''' | |
| − | |||
| − | '''A construction that uses Present Progressive to express Future is gaining space o the domain of Future reference in Brazilian Portuguese. This construction is basically composed by the Present Progressive structure (aux. pres + V. prog), followed by a temporal adverb that denotes future or, other expression of overt future reference. | + | Edited by: '''[[User:Franciane Rocha|Franciane Rocha]]''' |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | A construction that uses Present Progressive to express Future is gaining space o the domain of Future reference in Brazilian Portuguese. This construction is basically composed by the Present Progressive structure (aux. pres + V. prog), followed by a temporal adverb that denotes future or, other expression of overt future reference. | ||
<Phrase>28439</Phrase> | <Phrase>28439</Phrase> | ||
| − | This Portuguese construction is called Future Present Progressive in this work. Based on Garcia (2010) and Cintra (2008) we assume it to be an importation of similar English structures, such as the Futurate presented by Copley (2002), paired to the English Futurate Present Progressive presents on this last reference. | + | This Portuguese construction is called Future Present Progressive in this work. Based on Garcia (2010) <ref>Garcia A. S. . Verbos incompatíveis com o progressivo no inglês. SOLETRAS (UERJ), v. 20, p. 146-164, 2010.</ref> and Cintra (2008) <ref> Cintra MR. A perífrase “ir (pres.) + (es)ta(r) + gerúndio” como indício de inovação linguística. Estudos Linguísticos, São Paulo, v.37, n.1. 2008 p. 233-241. </ref> we assume it to be an importation of similar English structures, such as the Futurate presented by Copley (2002) <ref> http://copley.free.fr/copley.futurates.pdf </ref>, paired to the English Futurate Present Progressive presents on this last reference. |
This a study that intends first, to prove the productivity of Future Present Progressives in Brazilian Portuguese. Then, we will investigate the phenomenon that Brazilian Portuguese allows the composition of sentences of these kind with some verbs and completely forbids its combination with other verbs, as the data: | This a study that intends first, to prove the productivity of Future Present Progressives in Brazilian Portuguese. Then, we will investigate the phenomenon that Brazilian Portuguese allows the composition of sentences of these kind with some verbs and completely forbids its combination with other verbs, as the data: | ||
| Line 36: | Line 39: | ||
| − | The research will try to explain this compatibility pattern, going through the Future Present Progressive with primary focus on elements of its semantic domain. Tani (2004: 2) states that “when a certain type of verb does not appear in a certain grammatical environment, the reason must lie in the relationship between the two aspects” and her though in shared by some other linguists as Lyons (1977). Then, we will consider the semantic nature of the progressive construction and the lexical aspect of the verbs that they combine with in order to explain the pattern that we have observed. | + | The research will try to explain this compatibility pattern, going through the Future Present Progressive with primary focus on elements of its semantic domain. Tani (2004: 2) <ref> http://www.flet.keio.ac.jp/~colloq/articles/backnumb/Col_25_tani.pdf </ref> states that “when a certain type of verb does not appear in a certain grammatical environment, the reason must lie in the relationship between the two aspects” and her though in shared by some other linguists as Lyons (1977) <ref> J. Lyons (1977). Semantics. Volumes I and II. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.</ref>. Then, we will consider the semantic nature of the progressive construction and the lexical aspect of the verbs that they combine with in order to explain the pattern that we have observed. |
| − | As a first generalization one can probably say that the aspect of the main predicate and the grammatical aspect of the syntactic structure must be compatible. To check compatibility patterns for Future Present Progressive (henceforth FPP) in Brazilian Portuguese, we will depart from the Vendler’s ( | + | As a first generalization one can probably say that the aspect of the main predicate and the grammatical aspect of the syntactic structure must be compatible. To check compatibility patterns for Future Present Progressive (henceforth FPP) in Brazilian Portuguese, we will depart from the Vendler’s (1967)<ref> Vendler Z. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1967.</ref> classification of verbs. According to this categorization, verbs are classified into four semantic categories namely: achievements, activities, accomplishments and states. The author uses semantic features for his classification and also observes their possible combinations with general progressive forms as a legitimation test to his theory. |
| − | However, while Vendler’s classification might work well for English this not necessarily means that is works equally well for BP. While for English only two aktionsarten can be construed with the progressive (Vendler, | + | However, while Vendler’s classification might work well for English this not necessarily means that is works equally well for BP. While for English only two aktionsarten can be construed with the progressive (Vendler, 1967) <ref> Vendler Z. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1967.</ref>, that is, accomplishments and activities, for Portuguese all four aktionsarten are grammatically correct (Bastos, 2004)<ref> Bastos ACP. Progressive constructions in Brazilian Portuguese and English. Revista Letras, Curitiba, n. 63. Editora UFPR. 2004: p. 11-27, maio/ago.</ref>. So, departing from these observations, we will try to unveil the constraints and particularities of Future Present Progressive expressions in naturally occurring data from Brazilian Portuguese. |
''' | ''' | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | <references/> | ||
Contact: franrocha.fsaATgmail.com | Contact: franrocha.fsaATgmail.com | ||
Revision as of 12:36, 24 May 2012
| Brazilian Portuguese | ||
|---|---|---|
| Português Brasileiro [portuˈɡe(j)s] | ||
| Spoken in | Brazil | |
| Region | South America | |
| Total speakers | 190 million (2010 census) | |
| Language family | Indo-European | |
| Writing system | Latin | |
| Official status | ||
| Official language in | Brazil | |
| Regulated by | not regulated | |
| Language codes | ||
| ISO 639-1 | 639-1:pt-BR | |
| ISO 639-2 | ||
| ISO 639-3 | 639-3:por | |
| Linguasphere | ||
| Note: This page may contain IPA phonetic symbols in Unicode. | ||
Master Thesis's Synopsis
! Full text to appear...
Edited by: Franciane Rocha
A construction that uses Present Progressive to express Future is gaining space o the domain of Future reference in Brazilian Portuguese. This construction is basically composed by the Present Progressive structure (aux. pres + V. prog), followed by a temporal adverb that denotes future or, other expression of overt future reference.
| Estou | |
| est | ou |
| be | 1SGPRES |
| AUX | |
| viajando | |
| viaja | ndo |
| travel | GER |
| V | |
| a |
| a |
| to |
| PREP |
| Paris |
| paris |
| ParisOBJ |
| N |
| amanhã |
| amanhã |
| tomorrow |
| ADVtemp |
This Portuguese construction is called Future Present Progressive in this work. Based on Garcia (2010) [1] and Cintra (2008) [2] we assume it to be an importation of similar English structures, such as the Futurate presented by Copley (2002) [3], paired to the English Futurate Present Progressive presents on this last reference.
This a study that intends first, to prove the productivity of Future Present Progressives in Brazilian Portuguese. Then, we will investigate the phenomenon that Brazilian Portuguese allows the composition of sentences of these kind with some verbs and completely forbids its combination with other verbs, as the data:
- (1) Estamos nos mudando em duas semanas. (We are moving in two weeks.)
- (2) *Ele está percebendo a verdade amanhã cedo. (*He is realizing the true tomorrow morning.)
The research will try to explain this compatibility pattern, going through the Future Present Progressive with primary focus on elements of its semantic domain. Tani (2004: 2) [4] states that “when a certain type of verb does not appear in a certain grammatical environment, the reason must lie in the relationship between the two aspects” and her though in shared by some other linguists as Lyons (1977) [5]. Then, we will consider the semantic nature of the progressive construction and the lexical aspect of the verbs that they combine with in order to explain the pattern that we have observed.
As a first generalization one can probably say that the aspect of the main predicate and the grammatical aspect of the syntactic structure must be compatible. To check compatibility patterns for Future Present Progressive (henceforth FPP) in Brazilian Portuguese, we will depart from the Vendler’s (1967)[6] classification of verbs. According to this categorization, verbs are classified into four semantic categories namely: achievements, activities, accomplishments and states. The author uses semantic features for his classification and also observes their possible combinations with general progressive forms as a legitimation test to his theory.
However, while Vendler’s classification might work well for English this not necessarily means that is works equally well for BP. While for English only two aktionsarten can be construed with the progressive (Vendler, 1967) [7], that is, accomplishments and activities, for Portuguese all four aktionsarten are grammatically correct (Bastos, 2004)[8]. So, departing from these observations, we will try to unveil the constraints and particularities of Future Present Progressive expressions in naturally occurring data from Brazilian Portuguese.
References
- ↑ Garcia A. S. . Verbos incompatíveis com o progressivo no inglês. SOLETRAS (UERJ), v. 20, p. 146-164, 2010.
- ↑ Cintra MR. A perífrase “ir (pres.) + (es)ta(r) + gerúndio” como indício de inovação linguística. Estudos Linguísticos, São Paulo, v.37, n.1. 2008 p. 233-241.
- ↑ http://copley.free.fr/copley.futurates.pdf
- ↑ http://www.flet.keio.ac.jp/~colloq/articles/backnumb/Col_25_tani.pdf
- ↑ J. Lyons (1977). Semantics. Volumes I and II. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- ↑ Vendler Z. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1967.
- ↑ Vendler Z. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1967.
- ↑ Bastos ACP. Progressive constructions in Brazilian Portuguese and English. Revista Letras, Curitiba, n. 63. Editora UFPR. 2004: p. 11-27, maio/ago.
Contact: franrocha.fsaATgmail.com